Thursday, November 1, 2012

Old Fruit Tree Story Bears Bitter Fruit


Thursday, December 14, 2017  

4000 Year-Old Mystery Solved:  No Apple Tree                                                                        
  
If the apple is not the fruit in the world's oldest and greatest mystery story, then what is the fruit?  Why are the two super secret trees assigned the mystical names "tree of life" and "tree of knowledge of good and evil?" Why do two smart people yield to a forbidden "fruit" tree, instead of to one that is NOT forbidden, especially when both trees are right next to each other in the center of the garden?  How is the couple's disobedience of the very first commandment to be fruitful and multiply in the garden linked to their decision to make only fig leaf aprons, instead of complete clothing, in this incomprehensible narrative, with its guesswork of interpretations?

Your very easy and quick guide book answers all these questions and more, using the evidence in this dreamlike chronicle, for the only intelligent and sensible explanation of the world's oldest and greatest mystery story.  No alternate solution has been offered by anyone--you can be the first to try!

1.  Order your guide:   book identifies the fruit very quickly.
2.  Order on Amazon below.  But finish your reading first.

www.amazon.com 


*****
Key Found in Garden Center

Here is your key that unlocks the door, opens it, and solves the mystery:
BOTH TREES ARE IN THE CENTER OF THE GARDEN.  Neighbors.
Ponder this point long enough, and you will not need to read the book. And you will see clearly the source of the sexual undertones in the account.

Fact:  Two men could have eaten the same fruit Adam and Eve ate.

Now for the important question:  why does this tiny book's identification of the fruit in the center of this extraordinary garden, create such turmoil among allegory deniers, when the fruit's identification threatens no one's theological beliefs? The only thing the identification does is supply the world's oldest and greatest mystery story with a foundation of awareness all traditional story analyses have failed to provide.  So, what is the fruit? It's time for the answer. No other exegesis exists that lends such a degree of thoughtfulness to the story. And no other exegesis of the second and third chapters of Genesis, practical or theoretical, creates such emotional resistance to hard evidence--evidence that threatens Western sensibilities.


*****
Just Another Doctrinal Neologism?

Is the book's exegesis of the second and third chapters of Genesis just another neologism?  No, it is not.  If the book's exegesis is only the latest neologism, but not the exhumation and revelation of the original story, then not only do the individuals who first hear the story, have absolutely no idea what the story means, but neither does the original storyteller. Imagine the storyteller saying, "Sometimes I just say things.  I don't know what they mean."  It is somewhat difficult to imagine this event happening.

If it does happen, then the original storyteller tells the story while having no understanding of what they are saying, unless the storyteller decides to deliberately disguise and beautify the story, to hide its true meaning.  This will certainly require complex ability, to intentionally mystify at the very dawn of human consciousness.  It will also require the original listeners to not ask the original storyteller any questions about this new story--a story that makes no sense.  So, the mystification clearly happens later.  And, of course, when it does, everyone will know the meaning of the entire story. For a while.


*****
No Post-Modernism Here

Please note:  the exposition of the second and third chapters of Genesis in your book  Judge This Book By Its Cover  is directed to Africans who are fascinated by Western insistence on denying glaring, convincing evidence. This evidence in Genesis combines reason, emotions, logic, feelings, and spirituality for the feminine/masculine solution to an astounding enigma.


























2 comments: