Thursday, November 1, 2012


May 1, 2017          Attention:  BW University Students

6000-year-old Mystery Sensibly Solved in Six Minutes

The fruit is not the fruit in the world's oldest and greatest mystery story. So, what is the fruit?  Why are two normal fruit trees assigned the mystical names "tree of life" and "tree of knowledge of good and evil?" Why do Adam and Eve eat the forbidden fruit, instead of the story's fruit that is NOT forbidden, especially when both mystery trees are right next to each other in the center of the Garden?  How is the couple's disobedience of the first commandment to be fruitful and multiply in the Garden linked to their decision to make only fig leaf aprons, instead of complete clothing? Your easy six-minute book read answers all these questions and more, using only the evidence in the dreamlike story.

1.  Click on Amazon below.
2.  Order your book. 

Here is the key that unlocks the door, opens it, and solves the mystery:

Secular & Sacred Fruit Flavored Fear

Now for the important question:  why does the exegesis of the second and third chapters of Genesis presented in the above book create universal fear and anger, when the exegesis does not threaten most people's sex beliefs? The only thing the exegesis does is provide the world's oldest and greatest mystery story with a foundation of seriousness that taking a bite from an apple could never provide.  So, what is the fruit?  It's time for the answer.

Just Another Neologism?

Is the book's exegesis of the second and third chapters of Genesis just another neologism?  No, it is not.  If the book's exegesis is only the latest neologism, but not the exhumation and revelation of the original story, then not only did the individual(s) who first heard the story, have absolutely no idea what the story meant, but neither did the storyteller(s). It is difficult to believe this happened.

If it did happen, then the original storyteller(s) told the story while having no understanding of what they were saying, unless these original storytellers deliberately disguised and beautified the story, to hide its true meaning.  This would certainly have required complex ability, to intentionally mystify at the very dawn of human consciousness.  It would also have required the original listeners to not ask the original storytellers any questions about this new story--a story that made no sense.  So, the mystification probably happened later.  And, of course, when it did, everyone would have known what the entire story meant.  For a while.