Thursday, November 1, 2012
4000 Year-Old Fruit Mystery Cracked
Tuesday, September 26, 2017
If the apple is not the fruit in the world's oldest and greatest mystery story, then what is the fruit? Why are the two super secret trees assigned the mystical names "tree of life" and "tree of knowledge of good and evil?" Why do two smart people yield to a forbidden attraction, instead of to one that is NOT forbidden, especially when both trees are right next to each other in the center of the garden? How is the couple's disobedience of the preeminent commandment to be fruitful and multiply in the garden linked to their decision to make only fig leaf aprons, instead of complete clothing in this incomprehensible narrative, with its guesswork of interpretations?
Your very easy and quick guide read answers all these questions and more, using only the evidence in this dreamlike chronicle, for an intelligent and sensible explanation of the world's oldest and greatest mystery story. No alternate solution has been offered by anyone--can you be the first to try?
1. Click on Amazon below. Do it now, or finish reading first. No rush.
2. Order your guide. Book identifies both trees' products very quickly.
Here is the key that unlocks the door, opens it, and solves the mystery:
BOTH TREES ARE IN THE CENTER OF THE GARDEN. Neighbors.
Ponder this point long enough, and you will not need to read the book. And you will see clearly the source of the sexual undertones in the account.
Now for the important question: why does this tiny book's identification of the fruit in the second and third chapters of Genesis create such turmoil, especially among literalists, when the entity's identification threatens no theological beliefs? The only thing the identification does is supply the world's oldest and greatest mystery story with a foundation of awareness all traditional story analyses have failed to provide. So, what is the fruit? It's time for the answer. No other exegesis exists that lends such a degree of thoughtfulness to the story. And no other exegesis of the second and third chapters of Genesis, practical or theoretical, creates such an example of resistance to ancient evidence, if this evidence shakes current opinions.
Just Another Doctrinal Neologism?
Is the book's exegesis of the second and third chapters of Genesis just another neologism? No, it is not. If the book's exegesis is only the latest neologism, but not the exhumation and revelation of the original story, then not only do the individuals who first hear the story, have absolutely no idea what the story means, but neither does the original storyteller. Imagine the storyteller saying, "Sometimes I just say things. I don't know what they mean." It is somewhat difficult to imagine this event happening.
If it does happen, then the original storyteller tells the story while having no understanding of what they are saying, unless the storyteller decides to deliberately disguise and beautify the story, to hide its true meaning. This will certainly require complex ability, to intentionally mystify at the very dawn of human consciousness. It will also require the original listeners to not ask the original storyteller any questions about this new story--a story that makes no sense. So, the mystification clearly happens later. And, of course, when it does, everyone will know the meaning of the entire story. For a while.
Please note: the exposition of the second and third chapters of Genesis presented in Judge This Book By Its Cover is targeted to people who are fascinated by people who insist on denying glaring evidence, if it offends.